Work, but it may be somewhat incomplete in describing recent security (2) The glossary is rich in the history of early network security Knowledge combined with the reasoning presented in the Glossary. Whether or not to follow his recommendations, based on their own In other words, the usage rules, wording interpretations,Īnd other recommendations that the Glossary offers are personal Language (e.g., SHOULD NOT) in the Glossary must be understood as Recommendations made by this Glossary, and the use of RFC 2119 The IETF has not taken a formal position either for or against (1) The recommendations and some particular interpretations inĭefinitions are those of the author, not an official IETF position. Reference that should help the Internet community to improve theĬlarity of documentation and discussion in an important area of This document is both a major revision and a major expansion of the Not specify an Internet standard of any kind. This memo provides information for the Internet community. RFC 4949: Internet Security Glossary, Version 2
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |